Vishal Shanbhag
2005-01-03 21:13:11 UTC
Hi Karl
I definitely think that this would be a worthwhile
change. Are you going to take a lead on this? Has this
change already been made?
Please let me know.
Best
Vishal
____________________________________________
RE: [Middlegen-user] many2many
Baum, Karl
Mon, 11 Oct 2004 06:17:33 -0700
Without spending too much time looking into it, this
seems like it would be an easy
enough change. To sum up, I think the many2many tag
should not limit the number of
tables referenced, but simply specify the many to many
relationship exists. Does
anyone else think this would be a worthwhile change?
Thanks.
karl
________________________________
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Eivind Waaler
Sent: Mon 10/11/2004 3:35 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Middlegen-user] many2many
I think you actually have to include a table element
for every table. Bit
inconvenient.. The whole table/relationship
specification stuff is a
little inconsistant :(
.eivind
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on
ITManagersJournal
Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you
think of them. Give us
Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates!
Click to find out more
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl
_______________________________________________
middlegen-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/middlegen-user
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Send holiday email and support a worthy cause. Do good.
http://celebrity.mail.yahoo.com
I definitely think that this would be a worthwhile
change. Are you going to take a lead on this? Has this
change already been made?
Please let me know.
Best
Vishal
____________________________________________
RE: [Middlegen-user] many2many
Baum, Karl
Mon, 11 Oct 2004 06:17:33 -0700
Without spending too much time looking into it, this
seems like it would be an easy
enough change. To sum up, I think the many2many tag
should not limit the number of
tables referenced, but simply specify the many to many
relationship exists. Does
anyone else think this would be a worthwhile change?
Thanks.
karl
________________________________
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Eivind Waaler
Sent: Mon 10/11/2004 3:35 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Middlegen-user] many2many
I think you actually have to include a table element
for every table. Bit
inconvenient.. The whole table/relationship
specification stuff is a
little inconsistant :(
.eivind
I am using the many2many tag to indicate to
middlegen that a few of my relationshipsare many to many. This works great but the problem
is I would still like middlegento build the rest of the tables in the database. Is
there any way tell middlegen tobuild all tables while still indicating that certain
relationships are many to many?Thanks.
karl
-------------------------------------------------------karl
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on
ITManagersJournal
Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you
think of them. Give us
Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates!
Click to find out more
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl
_______________________________________________
middlegen-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/middlegen-user
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Send holiday email and support a worthy cause. Do good.
http://celebrity.mail.yahoo.com